Honestly, I Don’t Know What To Think
November 22nd, 2009The New York Times just came out with an article talking about the negative environmental impact of surfing. The article states: “About 316,000 surfboards were sold in the United States in 2008, generating about $150 million in revenue, according to the Surf Industry Manufacturing Association…”and that “’Every day in Southern California, about 800 boards are being shaped and as much as 40 percent of each blank, which contains toxic materials, ends up being put into landfills…” (Click here to read the whole story.)
Sounds pretty bad, no?
But then, Surfline.com comes out with a somewhat contradictory story. It posts an article about a UC Berkeley Grad Student/Surfer that did an analysis arguing that the true environmental impact of conventional surfboard production is relatively minor. He claims that “UPR surfboards result in the emission of 380 pounds of CO2, while epoxy constructed boards result in 545 pounds of CO2 emissions.”
Sounds bad, but what do these numbers mean? The article explains that a single 10,000-mile airline trip to your favorite surf spot would produce 4,600 pounds of CO2 and a single 1,000-mile car trip to your next favorite surf spot would produce 2,800 pounds of CO2. (Click here to read the whole article.)
So what is it: Is the pollution caused by surfboard production a big deal or a relatively not-so-big deal? I don’t know. But what I do know is that The Times article focuses on a San Clemente-based surfboard company, Green Foam Planks, that uses recycled boards and refurbishes them. They collect polyurethane cuttings, which come from the foam core boards, and mix them with virgin foam to create a board with 65 percent recycled waste.
Whether the pollution caused by surfboard manufacturing is a big deal or not, we are hypocrites if we don’t support any effort to keep our world, our environment and our waves clean. As surfers we should do our best to support all eco-friendly efforts.